Disaster or Emergency Text Message System

A Clear Plan – Emergency Management

Reading is perceived as a significant way to acquire knowledge. However, the readability of some texts is relatively low, making it difficult for one to learn. As such, writers need to use clear communication when conveying the desired message. Specifically, writers need to avoid factors such as multiple grammatical errors and complex words since they create disaster or emergency texts, which are difficult to read and interpret. In this context, the essay will discuss a disaster or emergency text, how to evaluate the reading level of a text, and the vulnerabilities of different families in distinct countries with respect to the disaster life cycle.

Disaster or Emergency Text

An excellent example of a disaster text is; Seismic quivers are noteworthy types of usual fiascos that have staid ramifications on the populaces in the inquiry. Overall, the material has complex words such as ramifications and staid that confuses the reader. The reader has to look for the meaning of several terms in the text. Also, there is a possibility that someone might misinterpret the meaning of the wordings in the text, which would automatically change its meaning. With this in mind, it is essential for writers to avoid ambiguous words and sentences (Prabavathi & Nagasubramani, 2018). When changed to plain English, the text would read as earthquakes are significant forms of natural disasters that have severe repercussions on the victims. The sentence is now easy to read and understand.

Evaluating the Reading Level of a Text

One way to analyze the reading level of a text is through an Automatic Readability Checker (ARC). Overall, the website works by taking a writing sample and calculating the number of sentences, words, and characters (Readability Formulas, 2020). The program then takes these numbers’ output and plugs them into several readability formulas that inform one on the reading and grade levels of their text. These formulas include Gunning Fog and the SMOG Index, among others. Results from these formulas enable one to determine whether their audience can read the writing or not. After referring some material to the ARC website, the Gunning Fog formula indicated that my content was relatively easy to read. On the other hand, the Flesch Reading Ease score showed that my text was easy to read.

Families’ Vulnerabilities and Disaster Cycle

The structure of households and the nation’s economy plays a substantial role in disaster vulnerability. In essence, extended families from developed countries such as the US would be less vulnerable to calamities as opposed to single families in underdeveloped economies such as Nigeria and Rwanda. Mostly, this is because extended families from developed states would be prepared for disasters in terms of finance, which would help them recover from the ordeal (Mynarska et al., 2015). More so, people from extended families can support each other emotionally, which is crucial in responding and mitigating the effects of disasters. On the other hand, single families from weak economies would lack the resources to recover and reduce the impacts of disasters. Also, the small number of people in the family reduced the quantity of emotional support such folks can receive from their loved ones.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the essay depicts that using plain English in text enhances its readability and the reader’s understanding. It is, therefore, crucial for one to avoid complicated words when writing. Notably, one method of analyzing the reading level of a text is via the Automatic Readability Checker. When responding or mitigating disasters, the structure of a household and the nation’s economy play a vital part in determining the vulnerability of families. These aspects are also crucial to families responding to and recovering from a disaster.